Contents

Bare Metal Programming vs RTOS

Bare-Metal Programming vs RTOS

1. What is Bare-Metal Programming?

  • Bare-metal programming means writing code that runs directly on the hardware, without any operating system or OS-like abstraction.
  • Programmer is responsible for:
    • Directly configuring hardware (registers, peripherals)
    • Writing the main loop, ISRs (interrupt service routines)
    • Managing timing, concurrency, scheduling

2. What is an RTOS?

  • An RTOS (Real-Time Operating System) is a lightweight OS designed to provide deterministic scheduling, task management, and inter-task communication, with guaranteed response times for critical tasks.
  • RTOS provides:
    • Task/thread management (scheduling, priorities)
    • Inter-task communication (queues, semaphores, mutexes)
    • Time management (delays, timeouts, timers)
    • Optional: device drivers, file systems, networking

3. Bare-Metal: Architecture & Code Structure

  • main() or `while(1)` loop runs forever, sometimes with polling and interrupt-driven events.
  • No threads, no context switching.
  • Interrupts are used for time-critical or asynchronous tasks.
  • Example (pseudo-C):
#include <stdint.h>
void main() {
    hardware_init();
    while (1) {
        read_sensors();
        control_actuators();
        if (check_event()) handle_event();
        // polling, delays, etc.
    }
}
// ISR for timer or input
void TIM_IRQHandler(void) {
    // Fast, critical code only
}

4. RTOS: Architecture & Code Structure

  • Code divided into tasks (threads), each with its own stack.
  • RTOS kernel schedules which task runs, based on priority/timing.
  • Tasks block/sleep/wait on events—no need for polling loops.
  • Example (FreeRTOS-style C):
void TaskA(void *pvParams) {
    while (1) {
        read_sensors();
        vTaskDelay(100); // Sleep for 100 ticks
    }
}

void TaskB(void *pvParams) {
    while (1) {
        if (xSemaphoreTake(xEventSem, portMAX_DELAY))
            handle_event();
    }
}

int main() {
    hardware_init();
    xTaskCreate(TaskA, "Sensor", 128, NULL, 2, NULL);
    xTaskCreate(TaskB, "Event", 128, NULL, 3, NULL);
    vTaskStartScheduler(); // Starts RTOS, never returns
}

5. Pros & Cons

AspectBare-MetalRTOS
ComplexitySimple, small codebaseHigher, kernel/library required
ControlFull hardware controlSome abstraction from hardware
Response TimeFastest possible, no kernelPredictable (if RTOS is well-tuned)
ScalabilityHard to scale, tangled codeModular, supports many concurrent tasks
MaintenanceCan get messy for large appsEasier for large, structured projects
TimingMust manage own timersRTOS handles time, tick, delays
FeaturesNo threads, simple ISRsTasks, priorities, semaphores, queues
Memory/FootprintMinimal (few KB)More (10KB–100KB typical)
DebuggingSimple for small, hard for bigRTOS can add complexity, but also structure
ExamplesSimple blinking, sensor readDrones, IoT, automotive, robotics

6. When to Use Each

  • Bare-Metal is best when:

    • Ultra-low-power, ultra-low-latency required
    • Tiny microcontrollers, cost-sensitive designs
    • Application is simple: one main loop, few peripherals
  • RTOS is best when:

    • Many concurrent tasks (control, comms, UI)
    • Complex timing/multitasking requirements
    • Need for modularity, portability, scalability
    • Application needs networking, file systems, or dynamic scheduling

7. Hybrid: Superloop + Cooperative Tasks

  • Some designs use a “superloop” with cooperative tasks (state machines), without pre-emptive RTOS.
  • Can add libraries for scheduling, software timers, or messaging.